 |
| The Body Centre on our village green |
As Pat and I went for our pre-breakfast walk the other day
we passed, as always, what was formerly
known as the Youth Club and which stands on the edge our village green. It is a
building that has recently had significant refurbishments although the building
itself is still relatively new – probably about 35 years old. It stands on the
site of what was originally part of the old junior school where both Pat and I
began out teaching careers. During the past few decades the building has been a
youth club, a place where the local Baptist Church meet to worship each Sunday
and a place where various groups of people have met for different types of
activity – table tennis, community meetings, old folks’ groups, discos and the like. A few months ago the
building was refurbished and it now is proudly called “The Body Centre”. Maybe all the activities
which previously went on still occur but there is no doubting now its intended
use and as we walked past the windows I noticed a young man in boxing gloves
and shorts punching the guarded hands of his trainer; clearly, he was hoping
one day to be heavyweight champion of the world. It was reminiscent of a scene
from the Sylvester Stallone film “Rocky”! On the wall behind him in huge black
letters were the words: “EAT, SLEEP, TRAIN, REPEAT”. When I came home I Googled
“Body Centre Ruddington” and
discovered that many physical activities
go on there:
“Boot Camps, Kettlercise
Classes, Metafit Classes, Personal Training, Sports and Remedial Massage and Corporate
Wellness Programs (sic)” says the web site. Rooms can be hired for parties,
the outside artificial grass pitch can be used for outside activities and
clearly every effort is being made to utilise the facility – and judging from
the tweets it seems to have a strong base of support. Obviously the local
council will want it to be successful and financially viable rather than
standing unused so all this is good news. But deep down I wondered – does this
“success story” reflect a little on the priorities of our modern society?
 |
| The Centre's web page |
Wherever one looks today we are reminded in a million
different ways of the physical aspects of life. Each day we seem to be
subjected to the latest research advising us to adopt this diet or take this
course of action if we want to improve our life chances. Don’t eat red meat,
eat oily fish, stay away from alcohol, eat a Mediterranean diet, fried
breakfasts are bad for you..... and so the list goes on. If we follow the
advice we are assured that we can add a few months to our lives; except it
doesn’t always work like that. A good friend ate the most healthy, vegetarian
diet imaginable, rarely used alcohol, was a long distance walker, was exactly
the right body mass, didn’t smoke and had regular health screenings and check
ups.........she developed a nasty aggressive bowler cancer followed by
pancreatic cancer from which, sadly, she died very young. Another good friend –
a sportsman through and through, and apparently supremely fit – collapsed and
died in his late thirties some years ago
while taking part in the Robin Hood Marathon here in Nottingham. Fate is cruel.
 |
| Pumping iron here in Ruddington |
Each bit of health advice often, too, contradicts others. As
we swelter in the UK heat wave at the moment we are advised to cover ourselves
up to avoid the chances of developing skin cancer. And yet there has been a
well proven trend in recent years suggesting that this policy is causing a
recurrence of rickets – a condition principally caused by a lack of vitamin D
which we mainly get from sunlight. We are bombarded with healthy “must dos” –
keep our body mass index in line with government recommendations, eat five
vegetables or fruit each day, take regular exercise.......and so on. We flick
the pages of the Sunday supplements and look at the magazines on display in the
newsagents and we see a wealth of slim, well honed and young (usually female)
bodies staring back at us. All of them
passing on, both overtly and covertly, the same message: “you can
look like this.....you should look like this.....if you don’t look like this
then you are failing”. And just as we are obsessed with the notion of the
body beautiful we also fret about the young becoming “couch potatoes” and our
health experts warn of a growing obesity epidemic. We regularly read of young
people who have been bullied, because of their size or young women who feel ashamed that their bodies do not
match up to the super slim models who prance up and down the catwalk. We all too
often read of young women undertaking
potentially fatal diets or suffering from one of the many slimming diseases.
Only this week in Nottingham we have had the inquest on a young girl who died
weighing only four stones after starving herself. She “fooled” her doctors by
wearing hidden ankle weights to make it look as if she was heavier than she
really was. Such is the pressure that as individuals and as a society we impose
upon ourselves to conform to what society deems as an acceptable physical
appearance and such is the overwhelming importance that we attach to the physical
aspects of our personality. We can blame the super models, we can complain
about the fashion media for this state of affairs but they merely reflect our
priorities. In the end we buy into the
fashion magazines, follow the diets and
follow the advice; we are society and we create the pressure. We
increasingly are fixated with the search for health, fitness, good looks,
eternal youth – or at least the look of eternal youth. Individually and a s a society we have an
obsession with the body and a desire to look and behave “young” - to not grow
old and to be fat, wrinkled or to be unable to do the things that we could do
when we were young.
 |
Circuit training.....Eat Sleep, Train, Repeat! Body
building maybe but mind numbing |
In this quest for youth thousands turn out to run marathons,
mini marathons, fun runs and the like. The
benefits of sport are promoted at every level: our government ploughed billions into the promotion of the
Olympic Games and its underlying premise was that it would encourage people to
take up sport and exercise for all the benefits they give us. Sporting bodies
like the FA pour billions into their respective sports and indeed fans pour
money into them at the other end. Newspapers have whole sections and pullout
supplements dedicated to sport; even my beloved Guardian – arguably the most
“serious” newspaper in the UK- has a daily sport supplement several pages in
length. It devotes little more than a page or two to other cultural pursuits –
the theatre, music, books and the like. But such is sport’s claim on the
mindset of our society that it has become ring fenced and beyond criticism. Our
roads are increasingly filled with lycra-clad men (and sometimes women)
peddling their hugely expensive bicycles as they seek to emulate their Tour de
France heroes and at the same time maintain their youth and fitness levels.
Incidentally, I often find this amusing. Those involved in cycling often quote
the Netherlands as a cycle friendly country and that we in the UK should adopt
the same ideas in our design and use of cycle lanes etc. They are right, but
there is, however, a difference as a trip to the Netherlands will quickly show.
The emphasis there is not primarily upon sport and maintaining fitness but on
practicality. It is quite rare to see the lycra clad cyclist on his or her
designer racing cycle. It’s true one sees thousands of everyday people,
peddling away down Dutch streets and through Dutch cities. They are clad in
their everyday clothes and mounted on very traditional machines using the cycle
as a simple and easy means of getting themselves (and often their children ensconced
in a huge basket on the front of the machine) from A to B. For the Dutch it
seems largely a matter of practicality but for us it is a matter of style, of
keeping our youth and of our obsession “image” and with the physical.
 |
One of the billions of trivial platitudes
posing as "wisdom" and to be found on any
social networking site in the 21st
century. They speak volumes about the
maturity and priorities of our society. |
In short we have become, in the UK at least, obsessive about
the value of sport generally but in particular fixated with the desire to
maintain our bodies, our health and indeed our youth for as long as possible. As
the message on the Body Centre’s wall said: “EAT, SLEEP, TRAIN, REPEAT” – the modern mantra, it seems, for today’s good
life. There is, of course, nothing wrong with that – indeed it is probably a
pretty laudable goal that we try to keep fit and healthy - but it also says
much about us and our priorities.
Firstly, this trend, increasingly, reflecting what I will
call “the culture of youth” – the desire of people to still be “youthful”
despite the fact that they are well beyond that age – which has become firmly
rooted in our 21st century culture belies, I believe, a certain
immaturity. On Saturday Pat and I went to see our grandson aged seven play in a
football competition. We had a lovely day and saw some super football. We were
surrounded by all the parents of the hundreds of players. The vast majority of the young (and not so
young) men stood there in their football shorts, their designer trainers and
their logo emblazoned replica football shirt proclaiming the name of their favourite player from
Manchester United or Barcelona or Chelsea or Liverpool. It seems to me quite
natural that a little boy might want to wear a top just like his favourite
player .......but a grown man? At what point does he accept the mantle of
adulthood or does he always want to simply be rather large little boy? In a
similar vein we see middle aged ladies keen to get in on the latest keep fit
dance routine in sports halls or gymnasiums or places like our newly opened
facility on our village green. Of course, there is nothing wrong with all this,
but underpinning it is the desire not to grow up; American moral philosopher
Susan Neiman suggests that “...by clinging impotently to youth we
impoverish youth and maturity alike”. Quite. And Robert Pogue Harrison – Professor of Literature – observes “.....the collective drive in modern
western cultures to make ourselves younger in looks, behaviour, mentality,
lifestyle and above all, desires is a malign influence. Our age’s self
defeating ruse is to give the young sovereignty of culture, all the while
depriving them of the opportunities, solitude, the example and the shelter needed to cultivate an authentic and creative
adult life.....” My feelings exactly. In short if we, the older
generations, still cling to youth and childish things then how are the young to
grow up to maturity of outlook, expression, desire, culture or opinion ? As I write this blog the words from
the Paul’s First Epistle to the Corinthians keeps intruding into my mind: “When I
was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child:
but when I became a man, I put away childish things”. Mmmmm!
 |
Modern day Peter Pans in their footy shirts
supporting their team (Arsenal) 2015 |
But if this desire to stay young, keep our bodies on good
shape, be obsessed with the physical aspects of our existence is a cultural
priority of the modern world it begs, I believe, a question; namely why the physical? Why not a similar
desire – or to use Harrison’s term “drive” - to make ourselves “brainier” or
“wiser” or more “spiritual”? Indeed, I would guess that the current fixation on
the physical is a relatively recent phenomenon. Although, clearly we have
always had recreations – many of them physical in nature – there has not been,
I believe until the second half of the twentieth century, the same emphasis
upon our physical well being on such a
mass scale. People have enjoyed participating or watching some form of
sport for hundreds of years but it has never reached the stage that it has
today of being a leviathan within the western culture. Maybe people simply have
more time to indulge themselves now? Maybe, as relative wealth has increased,
people have more opportunity to be narcissistic or to devote time to sporting
pursuits? But again it begs the same question why sport and fitness – why not
other more cerebral, artistic or spiritual pursuits? Whatever the reason we are
a culture obsessed with physical over more cerebral, academic, artistic or spiritual interests. In this we are, too, a
culture of contrasts.
 |
| Mature men, women and children supporting Arsenal in 1948 |
At the same time as we prioritise and become increasingly
obsessed with the physical we increasingly marginalise the other aspects of our
personalities: fewer and fewer of us admit to any great religious belief, our
churches are less well attended now than ever before and as a western culture we
seem increasingly suspicious of those who do have a faith – especially those
from the middle east. Our health provision consistently devotes less resources
to the needs of the mentally ill and to psychological and psychiatric well being than it
does to physical illness – and this despite the fact that all research
indicates that there is a far greater need than ever before for effective
mental health support in this age where an ageing population, drug and alcohol use, social isolation, the
breakdown of the family and extended family, unemployment and a myriad of other 21st century conditions
all contribute to a growing mental health problem. As austerity bites local
council shave been forced to cut back on “non-statutory” educational and social
provision; libraries are marginalised and where they do continue or perhaps
blossom it is often because there has been a conscious effort to make them
“accessible” and user friendly, to increasingly stock materials that are light
entertainment rather than more demanding places of learning. Masses of people
will pay eye watering amounts of money to watch their favourite football team,
to enjoy their SKY entertainment package or to enjoy the facilities of their
local gym but perceive a night at the opera or a visit to a concert hall or a
subscription to a library or evening school course as not worth it or too
expensive. And I wonder why – why, and on whose authority, should the physical
be deemed more desirable than the mental, the academic, the cultural or the
spiritual.
The things that I write of are not confined, I believe, to this country - they are prevalent throughout western societies. Noam Chomsky in his book "How the World Works" comments that: "I used to haunt the main public library in downtown Philadelphia.........those were the days when people read, and used the libraries very extensively. Public services were richer in many ways in the late 1930s ans early 1940s.......I think that's one of the reasons why poor, even unemployed people living in slums seemed more hopeful then....Libraries were one of the factors....[not] just for educated people - a lot of people used them. That's much less true now......I travel a lot and often get stuck in some airport or other. I used to be able to find something I wanted to read in the airport book store - maybe a classic, maybe something current. Now it's almost impossible...I think it's just plain market pressures. Bestsellers move fast and it costs money to keep books around that don't sell quickly..... One of my daughters lives in a declining town.... the town happens to have a good library staffed by a couple of librarians. I went there with her kids on a Saturday afternoon and nobody was there except the kids of a few professional families. Where are the kids who ought to be there?....probably watching TV....for them going to the library just isn't the thing to do. That's a big change since my younger days. It was the kind of thing you did if you were a working class person fifty or sixty years ago. [The] emptying people's minds of the ability or even the desire, to gain access to cultural [and intellectual] resources is a dangerous thing that is one step along the way to the totalitarian state". Absolutely - the unthinking and the uneducated rarely ask searching questions of those in power. Put it into the minds of people that the only thing that matters is "EAT, SLEEP, TRAIN, REPEAT" and you have a healthy but a docile, easily manipulated population.
 |
Me (front row, extreme left) in my draughtsman and
night school days |
When I left school in 1961 I was lucky to gain a post as a
trainee designer draughtsman in a local engineering firm. For two years I
attended night school four nights a week to study for the necessary mechanical
engineering qualifications. From Monday to Thursday I would leave home at 7.30
in the morning with two packets of sandwiches and two small thermos flasks: one
of these was for my lunch as I sat at my drawing board and the other I would
eat and drink for my tea. I left work at
5.30 pm, walked the couple of miles through Preston to the college and I would
sit with other similar students in the classroom – all of us doing the same
thing, eating and drinking – waiting for the class to begin at 7 pm. Then, at
9.30 pm, we would all troop off home. After two years I was given a day off from
work so that I could continue my studies in “work time”. I still, however, had
to go to night school for one night each week since I had left school without a
GCE O level in maths and had to,
therefore, do a “catch up course”. I didn't see all this as a problem – of course
I would rather not have had to study every night but I was not dissimilar from
many of my friends and it was firmly planted in my head that study was the way
forward. Of course, I still loved watching my favourite football team, Preston
North End, but I knew that any mid week games were only rarely an option for
me. It never occurred that I was missing out on going to the gym and even if it
had I'm quite sure that common sense would have told me that my future
qualifications were of more importance that pleasure pursuits. I would like to
think that young people today would view the world similarly – but I fear that
might not be the case – it would interfere with their “me time” or “chilling
time”.
Pleasure, games, sport, keeping fit were, for previous generations largely secondary
to the pursuit of some kind of self improvement. We might have wanted to go to
that football match or go ten pin bowling but these were games, pleasures and to
be kept in perspective – brief interludes in the job of growing up. Leaving
school was, at the time, a life marker; one was going to be concerned with more
adult things. As for going to the game in a replica football shirt bearing the
name of my favourite footballer I have absolutely no doubt that had I turned up
like that then Tony and Gary Clarkson, Stewart Kilner, Alan Smith, David
Bradshaw and the rest would have laughed at me, probably called me a “Big Jesse” and advised me to go into the children’s
section of the ground or go and hold my daddy’s hand. In short we looked
forward to growing up and the responsibilities that went with it – today, it
seems young men, especially, want to be Peter Pans who never grow up. In
writing this I am reminded of the feminist joke that appears with monotonous
regularity on social media sites: a little boy says to his mother that he can’t
wait to grow up. Mum replies “Don’t be
silly you’re a boy – you’ll never grow
up, you’ll just get bigger”. Harsh?
- maybe, stereotyping? – yes. But as with all stereotyping containing
more than a grain of truth.
 |
Headlines like this no longer raise an eyebrow. We can blame the government
but in the end the clue is on the right hand side of the page. As a society we have
changed our priorities: happy to narcissus like pay £99 for "Botox and fillers" less
motivated to pay more tax or fees for libraries; happy to pump iron and get the
adrenalin going less willing to read a "boring" book - this is a huge social change. |
Society has changed. Up until about twenty years ago
virtually every area of the UK had thriving night school classes where one
could, for a small or moderate fee, go
to learn some skill or develop and interest: learn a foreign language, learn
how to maintain a car, become skilled in needlework of some kind, learn cooking skills, dabble in a bit of
philosophy, develop your artistic skills, take a course in beginners’ economics
or psychology or Latin, develop photography skills, learn how to set up and get
the best out of your stereo system, refresh your basic English or maths, learn
how to make your own wine or beer. The list was endless. They weren't about
gaining qualifications – although that was sometimes an option – but rather
about developing an interest, widening horizons, keeping the mind active. Sadly
in the past two decades these have dwindled. Since Margaret Thatcher’s
governments local authorities have been
forced by economics to charge more for the use of the facilities and classes
have became more expensive. At the same time there has been a move to focus
more upon the gaining of qualifications rather than simple personal development
so courses leading to academic or professional qualifications have become
assimilated into the formal education system whilst those of a more informal
nature have simply fallen by the wayside. Whereas once I could attend a German
language course aimed at my two week holiday in Germany – now if I want to
brush up on my German I have to enrol on a course leading to a
qualification. Inevitably this is more
demanding and more costly and in my view it also removes one of the basic
elements of “education” – that real education is done for its own sake and not
first and foremost to gain a qualification.
 |
| Jesse Boot |
With this in mind I am reminded of Boot’s the Chemist. In
Nottingham where we live is the head office of Boot’s the Chemist and many
local people are employed in the factory and warehouses that are centred here.
For those not familiar with the UK, Boot’s have shops on virtually every High
Street throughout the country – they are a leading company. Boot’s was founded
by Jesse Boot here in Nottingham in the latter years of the 19th century
– it began as a small back street shop selling various “cures” and evolved into
the giant pharmaceutical dispensing chemist that it is today. Jesse Boot was
also a philanthropist – he has a school named after him and was very much the
founding father of Nottingham University. From his earliest shops he insisted
that his staff took every opportunity to better themselves; he paid over £5000
to install a great organ in the Albert Hall here in Nottingham – the organ is
still there, Pat and see it each time we visit the
venue for a concert. He encouraged his employees to learn a musical instrument
and provided them. There was a Boot’s Brass Band and a Boot’s Orchestra – still
in existence, a friend of ours plays in it today. He paid for the fees of the
organist at the Albert Hall but insisted that the organist played one concert a
week for as many of his employees (and their families) who cared to attend. The concerts were to be on Saturday afternoon
in order that they were available to all his workers and so that the children
of his workers could also attend and thus gain from the experience. He insisted
that each seat should cost no more than three pence. Each concert was to be a
recital - enjoyable but also worthwhile in that it would expose his workers to
music that they might not otherwise have the opportunity to hear and which
would encourage an interest in good
music. Finally he requested that concert goers should be well turned out so
that the event was treated as special and with respect; in short not only was
Jesse Boot widening the musical horizons of his workforce he was also helping
them to move up the social ladder. Records show that every seat was regularly
filled.
 |
The Albert Hall Nottingham - the "descendent" of Jesse Boot's
great organ still present |
Boot’s was and has
always been traditionally seen as a “good employer” in the locality. In following
Jesse Boot’s ideas throughout the years one of the “perks” of working at Boot’s
was the company’s desire to have a better educated work force, so all staff
were encouraged to attend night school classes – it was not compulsory nor was
it intended to necessarily gain further qualifications (although that was
always on offer) – but to simply broaden their horizons, better themselves and
thus, hopefully make them more aware people and thus more useful employees. I
don’t know whether this situation still appertains – Boot’s has long since been
taken over by one of the multinationals although its base is still here. But,
if it is a policy that the company still pursues then I would guess that it
doesn’t operate in quite the same altruistic and philanthropic way. Certainly
the unavailability of evening school courses of the type I described above will
limit it as will financial considerations, and I wonder, too, whether people of the 21
st
century will be quite so willing to commit themselves to an evening a week to some kind of “study” however mild
or light. I wonder, too, whether it would have the same attraction for many as
a night pumping iron or playing badminton or keeping one’s figure trim. Maybe
I'm wrong – but I don’t think so.
 |
| Ex-Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams |
I have just finished reading two wonderful biographies –
that of Rowan Williams the ex-Archbishop of Canterbury and of Roy Jenkins the
Labour politician often described as the best Prime Minister we never had.
These two men came from very similar
backgrounds – working class and from the mining communities of south Wales.
Rowan Williams’ parents like many of that generation - and especially in that
area – saw learning and church going as very much part of personal development.
It was the way to self improvement; as Williams’ biographer Rupert Shortt suggested it was a world
of “the tight knit, rooted in the world of the hearth, infused with the
spirit of decency”. There was a
disdain for what Shortt describes as
“the
homogenising effects” – or to use our modern phrase
“dumbing down” - of mass entertainment. Books and learning were
prized above all things – Shorrt records how
“delighted” Rowan Williams was to receive as his tenth birthday
present a Latin Grammar book. Meal times and evenings were the time for serious
discussion, where the child was gradually introduced to the world of the adult.
There was little place for the trivial – a far cry, I believe from much of
today’s child rearing and today’s world.
 |
| Roy Jenkins |
Roy Jenkins came from a similar background; in the words of
the biographer Jenkins’ father, Arthur, came from
“the great (now largely lost) tradition of Welsh self improvement”. Arthur
Jenkin’s left school at 12 to go down
the pit but over the next twelve years
by educating himself through evening classes and discussion groups he won a
miners’ scholarship to Ruskin College, Oxford – the college founded in 1899 to
offer the opportunity of higher education to working men who would not
otherwise have had access. On completion of his college course he had to return
to the pit but continued to read, attend classes and became involved in local
politics and slowly but surely he worked his way up. A relative talking about
the house that Arthur Jenkins and his family lived in commented
“And
the books! Why, there were books everywhere”. In 1945 when Clement Attlee
swept to power with his great reforming Labour government Arthur Jenkins was
appointed as a junior education minister – surely a tribute to his endeavours.
Sadly he died in 1946 but by then his son Roy – who reflected many of the
beliefs, values and aspirations of his father - was already contesting parliamentary
seats and became an MP in 1948. Roy fulfilled his father’s ambition by
becoming a cabinet minister and holding
many of the highest offices of state until his death in 2003.
 |
| John Meynard Keynes |
When the great economist John Meynard Keynes left Cambridge in the early years of the twentieth century he took his first job in the Government Treasury in Whitehall. Keynes came from a privileged family, the son of a Cambridge don and Keynes himself was considered to have a brilliant mind as his later career showed. When he began work at the Treasury he was advised by his chief, Lord Chalmers, that every man on his team and in life generally must
“drive two horses abreast, one his work horse and the other some scholarly enthusiasm” - I suppose in modern usage we would term this as being something of a Renaissance Man. Chalmers himself was a world authority on Pali and translated the sacred texts of Buddhism. Basil Blackett one of Keynes’ colleagues was a renowned translator of Byzantine Greek. Another colleague was an established poet, another was an expert on classical literature and so the list went on. Keynes himself was an authority on a number of things: the writings of the world's great philosophers, art, civic architecture and so on. When Keynes, shortly before his death, was presented with an honorary degree (one of many) by Cambridge University in his acceptance speech he commented that for
"....the first time in history humankind faces the challenge of coping with freedom from economic worry........ how will [mankind] occupy the leisure that science and economics will have won for him...there [are] no nations that can look forward to the age of leisure and of abundance that we now and increasingly will enjoy without a dread......" Keynes was clear in his own mind that it was the responsibility of all men and women to involve themselves in
"things of worth" that would satisfy the moral imperative as he saw it to live
"the good (worthwhile)
life". And for Keynes and his peers this meant things of the mind. Of course, one may argue that what constitutes
"the good life" will vary from person to person and what night be termed a
"thing of worth" will be a personal choice. But, whatever, Keynes's views reflect the difference in values between his age and our modern perception and what is certain is that Keynes, his peers and past generations would not think that "EAT, SLEEP, TRAIN, REPEAT" constituted a
"thing of worth" or fulfil the imperative to live
"the good life".
 |
| The chess room at Derby Mechanic's Institute |
Stories like the above, of course, are of a different
time and may well be considered not typical. One might argue that these were rather special people - indeed, in Keynes' case he was from a privileged position - the son of a Cambridge don and from a social circle and well to do family to whom learning would be natural and expected. But the desire to self improve and to value learning, skills pastimes and aspects of the personality that were perhaps more cerebral, reflective, intellectual or spiritual were embedded into the mindset of very ordinary people and families. People like Jesse Boot or Arthur Jenkins or Rowan Williams' family were not educational high flyers or “posh” – they was an ordinary people whose priority was to make good. Jesse Boot and the rest were not against having fun, enjoying themselves, playing sport or involving themselves in pleasant recreations. Indeed Jesse Boot regularly hosted sports days for his employees at this home where sports, refreshments, entertainments and the like were laid on for everyone’s enjoyment. But that was just what they were - entertainments, pastimes. Not to be confused with the serious aspects of an adult’s life and personality, the development of knowledge, skills, understanding, self improvement.
 |
| Part of the library at Otley Mechanic's Institute |
Only this week I received a programme from the Oldham Coliseum Theatre. Pat and I visit
there once a year to take our grandchildren to the pantomime – it is quite near
where our grandchildren live. One of the plays to be performed this coming
season is “The Pitmen Painters”. The programme tells me that:
“it is the true story of a group of
Northumberland miners in the 1930s who, desperate to improve their knowledge
and understanding of art, employed Robert Lyon, Master of Painting at Kings
College Newcastle. Unfortunately, the
lectures were not too successful, they were too academic, but Lyon realised
that a better approach might be to get the men actually painting rather than
talking about it”.
 |
| Some of the work of the Ashington School of Painters |
The results were amazing
- the group went on to become an
art phenomenon, celebrated throughout the art world. The men continued to work
in the pit until they each retired but their work (known as the Ashington
Group) was – and is still - displayed in galleries across the world. This is
self improvement at the sharp end. All these
examples coincided with the age of
institutions such as the Workers’
Educational Association (WEA) or The Mechanics Institutes - both hugely popular amongst working men and
women as a source of educational self improvement, of being able to hear
visiting lecturers of national standing, of a place for listening to concerts
or of hearing national politicians speak. Every town and city in the land had
such places and they were well used. Thousands, like Arthur Jenkins, or the
Ashington miners profited from their presence and the ambitions of individuals
to develop knowledge, skills and intellect were met. They thrived because they
were consistently well used just as today our towns are filled with gymnasiums,
sporting centres, boot camps and the like filled with individuals who want to improve
their physical well being, lose a few pounds in weight or look a bit younger.
 |
Nottingham Mechanic's Institute - records show that
people had to be turned away so popular was it |
All of these people would, I believe, find it not only
strange but very wrong that in our modern world leisure time is filled with
going to the gym or being obsessed with the physical aspects of one’s life.
They would be unable to comprehend that grown men are so immature and trivial
that they walk round in football shirts
proudly boasting their favourite footballer. They would find it immoral that
people diet - sometimes with fatal consequences - or undertake extreme physical
programmes simply to make themselves look good or to “copy” their fashion icons.
They would be horrified that libraries are considered a drain on resources and
that in order to make them well used they often have to be stocked with the
mundane and the trivial. Jesse Boot and all the others would never believe that
evening schools and the like have been allowed to wither away because people
are no longer anxious to support them or choose to spend their money on other
things. They would not believe that we have allowed successive governments to
ensure the demise of libraries and evening classes. They would be distressed
that great swathes of our society have abandoned the spiritual aspects of their personality –
not because everyone should be a practising be Christian (or of any other faith),
but simply because modern man and woman more often than not never even bother
to think about it. Religion and spiritual awareness has largely been
marginalised by many, condemned to the dustbin of history without even a second
thought. In short, they would simply not understand why both individually and
as a society we have largely rejected and allowed to fall into disrepair the
vast array of opportunities that we had for developing learning, knowledge,
awareness and skills - be they learning a foreign language, playing chess, learning the skills of needlework, understanding car mechanics
or philosophy, or ballet or Buddhism. They
would not comprehend why modern man or woman might choose the boot camp option
or the slimming club or the 5 a-side football night over the art appreciation
class, the improver’s course in maths or the introduction to home
maintenance. They would be bemused why
someone might find a motto like “EAT, SLEEP, TRAIN, REPEAT” to be inspiring or
worthy of response. They would be horrified to read the trivialities posing as "wisdom" and repeated
ad nauseam on social networking sites; for example,
"Being an adult was the dumbest thing I ever did" or
"Do what makes you happy and be done with all the rest". So many today have consciously or subconsciously
adopted the mantra
“I know what I like
and I like what I know” rather than
widening and deepening their horizons and their understanding of the world in
all, its many facets. They choose, just like Narcissus in the Greek myth, to be
fixated by themselves, their physical well being and their appearance content in their own
little world filled the trivial and the dumbed down.