At the beginning of 1858 Charles Dickens became President of the Great Ormond Street Children’s Hospital Appeal and on February 9th of that year he read his great book “A Christmas Carol” to an assembled audience of social reformers and potential donors. Before the reading he gave what is often regarded as one of his greatest and most powerful speeches about the social conditions of his time. The whole, very long, speech is recorded The Nursing Record of that time. In it he told of an experience he had had whilst on one of his many – almost nightly - walks around London’s poorest areas. Dickens frequently walked the streets of London at night – on his walks he got ideas for many of his plots, his characters (in books such as Oliver Twist, Nicholas Nickleby and, of course, A Christmas Carol) and to fuel his vivid descriptions of the great city of Victorian London. Dickens described in that speech to his audience of a powerful and telling scene that he had witnessed on one of his walks:
“There lay, in an old egg-box, which the
mother had begged from a shop, a little feeble, wasted,
wan, sick child. With his little wasted
face, and his little hot worn hands folded
over his breast, and his little bright
attentive eyes, I can see him now looking steadily
at us. There he lay in his little frail
box, which was not at all a bad emblem of the little body,
from which he was slowly parting, - there
he lay quite quiet, quite patient, saying
never a word. He seldom cried, the mother said;
he seldom complained; he lay there seeming
to wonder what it was about. “God knows” I thought, as
I stood looking at him, he had his
reasons for wondering - how it could possibly come
to be that he lay there, left alone, feeble
and full of pain. There he lay looking at us,
saying in his silence, more
pathetically than I have ever heard anything said
by any orator in alI my life, “Will you
please to tell me what this means,
strange man? and if you can give me any
good reason why I should be so soon
so far advanced upon my way to
Him who said that children were to come
into His presence, and were not to be forbidden,
but who scarcely meant, I think, that they
should come by this hard road by which I am
travelling..........”
Great Ormond Street Hospital was established in 1852 after a long campaign
by Dr Charles West, a personal friend of Dickens, with just 10 beds and on that
night when Dickens spoke to the little group of potential donors he read to his
audience “A Christmas Carol”. This was not an idle or little thought about
choice – Dickens was no fool and on this matter he was both angry and
determined to make people think so he chose his great Christmas tale to point a
finger at the excesses of the City and at the gradgrind world of the
accountant and selfish Scrooge-like figures that haunted it. But, he
also knew that people mattered when it came to care and compassion and so in
telling the story of the baby in the egg box he was unapologetically pricking
consciences and appealing to ordinary people to pay up, to be responsible for
the health and welfare of their fellow men. Together, the two stories were
intended to plant a moral question into the minds of his audience and to ask
them to shoulder the responsibility – not hand it on to some management
accountant or venture capitalist or private equity company. In short – and as
Dickens posed the question first set out in the Book of Genesis - to his
audience: “Am I my brother’s keeper?”
At the end of his reading of "A Christmas Carol" Dickens appealed directly to his audience and put the ball squarely in their
court: " Now, ladies and gentlemen,
such things [the sick child in the egg box] need not be,
and will not be, if this company, which
is a drop of the life-blood of the great compassionate
public heart, will only accept the means of rescue and
prevention which it is mine to offer and make a donation to this
worthy cause and if every grateful mother who brings a child to the
hospital will drop a penny into a box placed on
the wall of the hospital, the Hospital funds may
possibly be increased in a year by so large a sum
as forty pounds. I will not believe that in a Christian
community of fathers and mothers, and
brothers and sisters, the hospital can fail to be
well and richly endowed".
As Dickens concluded the records tell us, that there
were great cheers from the audience. It worked - the appeal was very
successful. Dickens acknowledged , it was a small drop on the ocean – he was
originally looking for only thirty beds (an increase on the 10 beds that the
hospital had started its life) but by 1865 there were 75 beds available.
It was very small stuff with which to tackle the giant health and social
problems of the time; the hospital had to depend upon the goodwill of well
wishers and patrons - but work it did. People put their hands in their pockets,
not necessarily for themselves but for their fellow man and woman – Great
Ormond Street Hospital was born. Today, of course, Great Ormond Street is one of the great hospitals of the world, one of the "jewels in the crown" of our nation, but it was born of a small acts of giving from well intentioned but ordinary people.
I wonder,
today, as 2020 nears its end and when Dickens’ great Christmas tale is in many
minds, what the author would say of a country that almost 200 years after he
wrote his great works and despite being one of the richest nations the planet
has ever seen still needs food banks, campaigns from high profile people like
Marcus Rashford, and hand outs from international agencies such as UNICEF to
feed its poorest. I wonder, too, what Dickens would write of the wealth and
excess that typifies the City of London and many of those (like Jacob
Reece-Mogg) who benefit from its wealth and excess or work in its gilded towers
when contrasted with the lot of people who live in places like Southwark –
within walking distance of that great financial centre – and other similar
deprived areas throughout the land? Almost two centuries have passed since
Dickens took his midnight walks through the gas lit streets of Victorian London
where beggars, poverty stricken children and ill health amongst the poor was
common place. Sadly, however, as the report by Sir Michael Marmot “Fair Society, Healthy
Lives” published last week showed with frightening clarity, little has really changed for many in those two centuries. I think that our current discontents would have
depressed and angered the great writer – as would the facile and offensive comments
by Reece-Mogg, who is himself one of the great beneficiaries of the wealth,
excess and accountancy world of the City of London. It would also have offended Dickens to hear that a well respected world
institution like UNICEF in trying to help the most needy in society, was condemned by a receiver of great wealth, as just “playing politics.”
And there is another point which in many ways is the most telling – both of Dickens’ efforts to raise money for the fledgling hospital and the reaction of Reece-Mogg to the UNICEF act of giving in 2020. It is this; The Nursing Record of February 1858 in recording the events of that night when Dickens appealed for donations ended its report with these words: “.....the ladies and gentlemen of the audience afforded Mr Dickens great and rousing cheers as donations and endowments were pledged....”. Clearly they were applauding the man and his great story and his appeal but were they not also applauding something else – namely the very act of giving? When these wealthy Victorians had pledged and donated did they not simply feel good about it and a little more human – so they cheered and applauded. That is true of most of us – when we give it makes us feel better about ourselves, we feel that we are making a contribution to someone’s happiness – be it a birthday or Christmas gift to a friend or relation or a donation to a favourite charity - the result is the same. The act of giving to someone else gives us some kind of personal dignity and a feeling that we have contributed to the community, to the greater good, to the common good. We might be cynical and say that if Bill Gates donates millions to some cause he is merely easing his tax burden - and it might be argued that he is – but that does not alter the fact he can still feel good about his actions, he has made a difference to the life of someone else. From my perspective if that is, to use Mogg's words "playing politics" then I say bring it on"! It is a basic aspect of the human condition that most of us wish to feel good about ourselves, to have a high level of personal esteem, to feel that others look up to us – and when those feelings are not there it can impact upon our mental health – it is the consequence of being a social animal. So it is no surprise that those long gone Victorians cheered and applauded when they had done their good deed – had we been in that room we would have probably done the same – and given ourselves a pat on the back and thought how virtuous we were. It’s called being human.
Sadly,
however, Jacob Reece-Mogg, the MP for North East Somerset and bizarrely the man
appointed by our present PM as the Leader of the House of Commons has no such humanitarian
feelings. Presumably had he been in that room that night in 1858 he would have
left before the end muttering about Dickens being some kind of “leftie
anarchist playing politics”. He would have kept his hand firmly on his wallet,
unmoved by the pictures that Dickens painted of life for the poor in what, at
that time, was the greatest and wealthiest city on the planet. It is a damning and moral indictment on Mogg who is a devout Roman Catholic, that this Scrooge like millionaire is so
scathing on those who seek to help the poor – UNICEF, Marcus Rashford and
others – when one of the great prayers of the Church – and especially the Roman Catholic Church - is that of St Ignatius of Loyola; a prayer which reminds us
all of our personal and Christian responsibilities, and the moral imperatives which ought to guide our actions as human beings – especially in the act of giving:
"Teach me good Lord to serve thee as thou
deservest
To give and not to count the cost,
To fight and not to heed the wounds,
To toil and not to seek for rest,
To labour and not to ask for reward
Save that of knowing I do Thy Will"