01 March, 2026

Being Governed By The Basest Of Instincts

Tony Benn was right in 1991 when speaking of the Iraq war and his comments are just as right and relevant this weekend as America once again makes war and brings death to innocents. Iran may well be a dreadful state with terrorist links, Trump and Netanyahu may well feel they have a strong case for their actions but war is not and can never be the solution; in short it is an admission of the failure of mankind to reason, to talk, to try to understand others and incontrovertible evidence that mankind is governed by the basest of instincts - to kill to get what he wants. Even if I accept the argument that Iran and its leaders had to brought to justice I cannot condone America and Israel's war - and for one simple reason. Iran might well be a threat, they might well sponsor terrorism but if we in the west are to have any moral justification we have to be better than that. If we are not then when he sends our drones and our missiles we are no better than the terrorist acting on Iran's orders.
This would abhorrent, immoral and unjustifiable even if it carried out on the orders of a responsible president following the best advice from America's greatest minds. As it is, what we are seeing is the death and destruction of mostly innocents, a world stepping several steps nearer to the precipice, and all promoted and carried out on the orders of arguably the world's two greatest madmen playing a nightmare game of brinkmanship and terror for their own distorted ends. Trump and Netanyahu claim that this action is justifiable - I trust, therefore, that both of these gentlemen will be travelling to Iran in the next day or two to lay flowers at the graves of the innocents killed by their drones and missiles. And that they hug, empathise with, and explain the moral and political justice of their actions individually to each and every one of the mothers of dead children, and the families of dead brothers, sisters, wives, husbands and grandparents and say why their loved ones had to die or suffer such treatment; surely these "great leaders" could and will do no less - it's called being human.
Sadly, I won't hold my breath on that one, but it is what should happen, for if it doesn't it tells us much about the immorality of Trump and Netanyahu and. the justification for their actions. The peoples of the USA and Israel should be ashamed of what they have wished upon the world.


 

28 February, 2026

If we vote for clowns get a circus!

The other night Pat and I watched the excellent docudrama “Dirty Business” about the dreadful state of our privatised water system. It was overwhelmingly depressing, chillingly worrying and guaranteed to make anyone critical of those who make decisions on our behalf. The content of the programme I will leave for another time – there’s only so much rage my old heart can stand these days But sufficient to say we, in the UK live in a country where all the public utilities – the essential services upon which the nation depends have been or are being “sold off” to private companies, most of them not based in the UK. These vast financial conglomerates – hedge funds and private equity companies - are buying up our essential public services to make a profit – at the expense of all of us. The result is poorer service, higher prices and, in the case of the water industry, increasing environmental and health issues as the “family silver” – the water industry, the NHS, the railways, vast swathes of our education system and the energy industry is given into the hands of private individuals. I am reminded of the warning of the great economist John Maynard Keynes who famously told us: "Capitalism is the extraordinary belief that the nastiest of men for the nastiest of motives will somehow work together for the benefit of all” – and, as the docudrama showed us, there are some seriously nasty men and women indeed reaping the profits from the millions of us who pay our water bills and I suspect they have a hearty laugh on their way to the bank.
But we are where we are – and as I say, there’s only so much rage my old heart can take these days.
It was Margaret Thatcher over 40 years ago who gave the initial green light to the privatisation of water and some of our other utilities., the idea underpinning the policy was that it would remove the vast costs of running and providing these services from the exchequer and place it in the hands of private companies – the companies would profit and the government would not have to raise tax from the population to pay for the services; it was supposed to be a win win for everybody; the government is released from its obligations and the electorate get tax cuts, which, of course, as Thatcher and other politicians knew is what people will always vote for. As time has shown, however, it has been a disaster – private companies have walked away with vast profits but the nation has suffered poorer quality provision. higher prices, and increasingly been asked to fund huge pay-outs to these companies.
But it would be quite wrong to lay the blame entirely at Thatcher’s door. In the years since every government of whatever persuasion has carried on and expanded the privatisation of our basic services. At the time of Thatcher’s premiership she brought the worst out in me – and sad to say still does today, but, I will say one thing in her favour she was a serious politician – she made no concessions to the baying mob. She did what she believed in, no-one could say they hadn’t been warned. I disliked her and disliked her policies even more but she was, whatever one says, a leader, she had gravitas and hinterland; she was not the shallow husks, the playboys, the wannabes and the populists that fill the parliamentary benches and take up residence in 10 Downing Street today. Thatcher didn’t feel the need to be “liked” because she was convinced of the rightness of her beliefs – whereas today our politicians are made of poorer stuff. The nature of leadership is to make the hard decisions, not pander to the mob. Great leaders – Churchill, Attlee, Macmillan, Wilson in our country or Kennedy, Johnson and Roosevelt in America for example – didn’t feel the need to demean themselves by seeking cheap popularity – they had policies that they believed in and took the necessary tough decisions to ensure that they became a reality - whatever Joe and Jean Public said or thought.
We as a nation are desperately in need of grown up, serious thinkers, people with both intellect and the moral fibre, like those I mentioned above, to do the right thing for the common good. Instead, we have been let down by a series of intellectual midgets, political dwarves and morally bankrupt wannabes as prime Minister: Blair, Cameron, Johnson, Truss, Sunak and Starmer and these have been backed up by hundreds of low quality MPs from all parties, all on the Westminster gravy train. The only PMs we have had since Thatcher who offered something approaching true leadership were John Major, Theresa May and Gordon Brown – and there’s the rub. Each of these three were vilified by many in their own party and by the wider electorate, they didn’t relate to the “common man”, they didn’t always say the right things, they pointed out that hard choices had to be made, they didn’t try to be everyone’s friend; in other words, they were leaders and not just panderers, anxious to curry favour and be popular with Joe and Jean Public. I’m utterly fed of hearing that Keir Starmer is a good guy because he pulls on his fake England footy shirt and plays 5 a-side footy with his mates and that he supports Arsenal. I don't want a man baby who refuses to grow up and be a kid again playing footy with his mates - I want a serious adult who has put childish things away and entered the adult world. I’m not interested in people like Tony Blair who, in his desire to be loved, told us "Call me Tony" and extolled the virtues of various pop groups to impress the mindless mob.

In 1997 on the night Blair won his landslide majority I sat up to watch the results come in – I went to bed at just after 2 am depressed and horrified as I watched Blair and his fan club singing a cheap and tuneless pop song “Things can only get better” on the steps of Downing Street. I was delighted at a Labour victory but it all reminded me of football terraces, of drunken louts in a city centre and it seemed to me then and does even more so today to be a metaphor for the death of serious politics and serious politicians in this country.

And I wept for Neil Kinnock, a serious politician, who had been Labour leader before Blair; who had made the necessary and difficult changes to make Labour electable again and brought a hinterland, a dignity and a pride to the Labour Party after a difficult interlude. Kinnock’s background music to his political meetings and conferences was not a cheap drunken pop song as favoured by Blair but the uplifting and powerful 3rd movement of Brahms’ 1st Symphony. But 21st century Joe and Jean Public don’t want “uplifting”, they don’t want dignity, they don’t want hinterland, they don’t want leadership, they want happy clappy, dumbed down, easy politicians with cheap and mindless sound bites, they want razzamatazz, they want everyman – not boring fuddy-duddies who can actually do the job and make the hard but right decisions. In our flashy media driven celebrity world appearance is everything and staid middle aged thoughtful people like Gordon Brown or Theresa May just don’t cut it when good old Boris with his gags and his daft haircut are around or Peter Mandelson is schmoozing and whispering sweet nothings in Joe Public’s ear – and look where that got us! If we choose inconsequential and trivial people to represent us then we must suffer the consequences.

So I don’t blame Margaret Thatcher entirely for what has happened or is happening to our country. True, she started many of these balls rolling but we have had plenty of time to reverse the direction of travel and we have failed. As an electorate we have increasingly, through our voting in of poor quality “leaders” and representatives of all parties, taken the easy way out. We have, through our votes, and just like Esau in the Bible, sold our birth right, our family silver, for a mess of pottage – for tax cuts, for cheap food, for the massive cuts in the “red tape” and the bureaucracy which protect us and makes life more sustainable, pleasanter, fairer, more decent; we have traded these aspects of the common good in favour of the low cost government promised by the snake oil salesmen of all parties. So, when you next complain about the potholes in your street, the waiting time to see your GP, the time your Granny spent lying on a trolley in a hospital corridor, the dreadful water supply, the cost of train travel or its inefficiency, the cuts to provision being made in your child’s school, the lack of job opportunities for our young people, the morally bankrupt policy of student loans, the poor response of your depleted and underfunded police force, and all the other ills that our society faces ask yourself how it has come to this. Don't blame the Labour Party or the Conservatives - it's not the party; political parties are made up of people and it’s the poor quality of the people we have voted for who are to blame; we preferred representatives and thus leaders who drunkenly sang and told us “Things can only get better” (they lied!) or that we should give approval to a middle aged man who might be a decent well intentioned guy but is too anxious for us to see him running around a 5 a-side pitch in his wannabe England footy shirt rather than be intent on his job as a leader, taking the hard decisions needed in the national interest and for the common good.

Today, the Green Party won a by-election and rightly celebrated. The newly elected MP, Hannah Spencer, is an ex-plumber who celebrated by eating fish and chips outside the local chippie and was photographed taking a selfie beside her cheering supporters. I'm sure that Ms Spencer is a splendid lady with many virtues and the best of intentions but I'm not convinced she has the gravitas, intellect or the hinterland to be an effective leader charged with making the right choices on our behalf. 

In the end she was and is like so many of our political class concerned with image (her own) rather than substance, hence her desire to portray herself eating chips and taking a selfie - it's what impresses Joe and Jean Public in 2026 Britain. The moral in this sorry tale for today is that in the end we get the leaders, and by extension the country, that we vote for; in short, if we vote for clowns we don't get serious grown up government and leadership, we get a circus. And that in turn allows the sort of criminal activities depicted in the docudrama "Dirty Business" to flourish. 

03 February, 2026

A creature of habit

 I am a creature of habit. I guess I always have been - and as I get older I could easily be a fully paid up member of the dull men's club. Like nearly every Monday night for the past 30 plus years I sit listening to my beloved music in the silence of the house. The lovely Patricia is out at her choir practice so I have the house to myself and my music. The music tonight is, as it is more often than not, Bach. As I write this I am listening to the magical sound of Canadian pianist Angela Hewitt (picture left) playing Bach Toccatas (click link Hewitt Tocattas ). Hewitt is unarguably the greatest living exponent of Bach's keyboard works. Other Mondays it might be another great Canadian Bach master, the late Glenn Gould. Gould is and was, in my view and of many others, the greatest ever interpreter and performer of Bach's keyboard works. To listen to the sublime brilliance of Gould playing Bach's Goldberg Variations ( click link Gould Goldberg Variations) or Bach's Forty Eight Preludes and Fugues or the keyboard concertos is for me (and I believe many others) breath taking, spiritually uplifting and almost guaranteed to reduce me to tears.

On other Monday nights I might enjoy and marvel at Bach's contrapuntal brilliance as I listen to Gould or Hewitt perform his Art of the Fugue. All of these are defining works of western music, and all acknowledged as some of - if not - the highest musical achievements of mankind. It is no surprise to me that Gould's rendition of the Forty Eight Preludes and Fugues and the Goldberg Variations were recorded on a golden disc and placed into the 1977 Voyager spacecraft and sent into deep space. The intention being that if the spacecraft and disc were discovered by some far off civilisation they would represent some of the greatest achievements of humankind. Nor can I disagree with Dr Toby Lipman's comment that: "If humanity and all our works were to be destroyed but just one thing saved to represent us, I would save the music of Johann Sebastian Bach. For if that small remnant of what we were was discovered by Intelligent beings across the galaxy, then they would say of us: ‘they must have been a great and noble race’."

I have loved Bach for almost as long as I can remember - certainly since I was about 9 or 10. When I was about that age my mother somehow came by a second hand piano. She could play a little and sent me for piano lessons - which, as I became teenager, and to my later shame and great regret I did not take too seriously. None of my friends played musical instruments and football, cricket and other teenage pursuits took over, much to the frustration of my mother and I think the sadness of my piano teacher - a gentle and kind silvery haired lady called Miss Sylvia Halton. So, although I learned to play the piano, I never pursued it to the level I ought to have done - a thing I regret to this day.

However, when we got this piano there came with it a piano stool and in the space under the seat was a pile of old sheet music. Most of it was of no interest and unknown to me but one piece stood out - Bach's Jesu Joy of Man's Desiring. In the early and mid 1950s when all this occurred this piece was often heard on the radio (no TV for us then!) - it was popular request on radio shows like Two Way Family Favourites. This was only 10 years after the war had ended and the piece had become very famous during the war. The great pianist Dame Myra Hess (picture left) often played it in lunchtime concerts that she organised and were broadcast to the nation throughout the blitz from the National Gallery in the centre of London (click link Hess Jesu Joy ); it was a small act of defiance but an important rebuff to Hitler's bombers who flew over the capital every night with their deadly payloads - and as such it caught the nation's imagination. So, when I saw the sheet music for Jesu Joy of Man's Desiring my enthusiasm for the piano suddenly increased and I can remember deciding that I was going to learn to play this work that I had heard so many times on the radio. It, was, of course far too difficult (Bach's music is never easy!) but I persevered and slowly but surely I managed something approximating to the real thing - and as the years passed I could play it without the sheet music! It became part of me - and is still today very much part of who I am. Patricia and I had the piece played at our wedding in 1969 and throughout my teaching career it became part of almost every week. It was not unusual - especially if it had been a bad day - to find me sitting at the piano in the empty school hall before the school day, at lunchtime or when the kids had gone home, playing Jesu Joy. It wasn't just about relaxing or destressing but I think more about reconnecting with what was important to me as a person.
And that is what my Monday nights are. A time to indulge myself and reconnect with what is important to me. It's not always Bach that I listen to when I'm alone - Handel, Scarlatti, Vivaldi, Purcell, Telemann, Rameau and other Baroque composers get a look in - but Bach is my first and last love. As I say, I'm a creature of habit!

30 January, 2026

Two, Four, Six, Eight - Who Do We Appreciate.......?

I've always loved sport - especially football and cricket - but as I get older I am increasingly of the mind that sport and associated physical activities are becoming a modern day - and perhaps unhealthy - obsession in the hearts and minds of many. My much loved Guardian newspaper - allegedly a "serious" paper - has page after page of sport related news every day which suggests to me that many want to read about it, but makes me increasingly wonder and worry about the priorities of much of the public. If I go to my local Lidl supermarket I walk past a gym with huge windows and no matter what time of day or night I pass the place is full of people pounding the treadmills, trancelike, their eyes glazed over, almost a modern day act of religious homage. And, watch the crowd at a Premier League (or any other league) football match and you will see thousands of man-babies dressed in their replica team shirts emblazoned with their hero's name, all in various stages of ecstasy or rage, losing all sense of reason and maturity when their team scores a goal or when something upsets them.
Of course, all sport has many desirable benefits: fitness and good health, healthy rivalry and fun, a sense of comradeship and team spirit but as George Orwell famously said when talking, especially about professional sport "Sport is war minus the shooting". Orwell was not wrong; in the end for both participants and audience most sports are intensely tribal and innately aggressive. This manifests itself in many ways: on the field aggression and violence on the terraces, tribal (and often obscene) chanting and hooliganism, hate mail sent to officials and others and a myriad of other less desirable" virtues". Even children's football is today not exempt from unpleasant on and off the field misbehaviour or worse.
The great Liverpool FC manager Bill Shankly once said "If you are first you are first. If you are second you are nothing" and he quickly followed that up with perhaps his most famous comment: "Some people think that football is a matter of life and death. I can assure you, it's much more important than that." Mmmm! - as a football player, a manager and a man Shankly was second to none but he was dreadfully and awfully wrong in these comments. Football or any sport is not more important than life and death except in the minds of grossly immature and easily influenced people, nor is being second "worthless". Once one accepts that winning, being first, is the only thing that matters then it is a recipe for feelings of mass failure (for there can only be one winner) and a potential springboard for aggressive response; if being the "winner" is the only criteria for my or my team's success then I will fight - perhaps aggressively - use any means, to ensure that I win.
A couple of days ago my much loved and home town football team, Preston North End, put out a notice on social media and in the local press requesting and warning that fans should not sing/chant various songs during matches. Anyone doing so, the Club said, would be banned from games and there may be police involvement. Songs and chants have always been part of football but when I read the words to some of these modern match day "hymns" I was horrified at their content. These were not simply humorous or mildly mocking ditties of the type I knew as a teenager (e.g. "2, 4, 6, 8, Who do we appreciate? .....Preston!" or sung to the tune of the Rolling Stones' hit 'Not Fade Away': 'You're gonna know how it's gonna be be.......Blackpool 2, Preston 3") but crude verbal pornography aimed at the opposition or the players or match officials. And as I read the vulgar and obscene words I wondered what must go on in the hearts and minds of those who happily chant and sing them. I wondered do these man-babies use such language and thoughts in their homes, to their children, or to their mothers? Are they not ashamed of what their parents might once have been ashamed of? Have we as a society fallen too far - does football (or any sport) justify this? And if so, is it worth it? Is it worth the pages that my Guardian and all the other media outlets devote to it, is it worth the obscene amounts of money involved in modern day sport and especially in Premier League football?

In the end football or any sport, is a pastime, an entertainment, a game to be enjoyed either by playing or watching - nothing more, nothing less. It might provide certain benefits like physical fitness or the opportunity to join with others in a positive manner, a "team spirit", a sense of belonging and these are all well and good and highly desirable. But when aggression, loss of "reality", violence, obsessive behaviour, or hero worship become part of it, when it becomes the be all and end all of life and reason then it has no place in society.

In his 2006 novel "Kingdom Come" author JG Ballard prophesied with huge accuracy the world of England 2026 where so many have taken sport to obsessive limits. Ballard's futuristic, but in the event wholly accurate, tale tells of marauding gangs of men in their replica football shirts, attacking those of other ethnic origins, surrounding the homes and businesses of those they pick upon, and waving flags of St George as they make their way to the next big sporting event to fill their minds and waking hours. It is a prescient and alarming work that depicts many of the events we saw in 2025 in places like Essex. Ballard wrote: "Sport is the big giveaway. Wherever sport plays a big part in people's lives you can be sure they're bored witless and just waiting to break up the furniture." The twenty years since 2006 have shown that he was not wrong.

But it doesn't have to be this way; enjoyable though sport might be, there are other less provocative and potentially less aggressive outlets for the emotions and mankind's "need" to come together.

This letter in today's Guardian(click link) Guardian Article and the article it refers to are exactly right. There are many other ways of getting the same benefits provided by sport: comradeship, team spirit, achieving a goal, physical and mental well being etc. The arts in particular provide positive frameworks for people to come together and experience the emotional, social and mental well being that sport might provide without the negative and competitive aggression and tribal "baggage" Dancing of various kinds, making music - be it classical or heavy metal, performing in a play or being part of a theatre back stage "team" can and do provide exactly the same opportunities, experiences and outlets that sport might provide.

When I watch an orchestra, choir and soloists perform (say) Bach's B Minor Mass I see hear and enjoy great talent and skill combining perfectly with many individuals and groups to produce this glorious music - it's the ultimate team endeavour as well as one of the great musical wonders of the world. Like a great football match it can and does uplift, inspire, bring you to tears and excite your senses, drain your emotions and at the same time give a huge sense of camaraderie and social fulfilment to know that you are enjoying it surrounded by other like minded people. When I watch a ballet I see dancers, their physical skills honed to levels that Premiership footballers can only dream about, perform with hugely talented musicians to create a visual entertainment that is infinitely more stunning and beautiful than anything that can be created on the football pitch. It's the same when I go to the theatre to watch Shakespeare or the opera to watch "The Magic Flute". And the bonus is that when I'm enjoying a Mahler symphony or the ballet Swan Lake, or Shakespeare's King Lear I am surrounded understanding, mature, knowledgeable and enthusiastic fellow travellers and not by belligerent, immature, bull necked man-babies in their cheap but grossly overpriced replica football shirts screaming obscenities and losing all sense of reality and any grasp of basic humanity.
Sport is not and must not be an excuse for excess, for permitting behaviour on the street or in wider society that is an affront to the ordinary man or woman. The behaviour now accepted as alright because it is just blokes enjoying their sport on the streets, in pubs and in football stadiums when a goal is scored or when the referee gives a decision with which the crowd disagrees would be considered unacceptable, a sign of mental breakdown or worse in bygone days or in any other aspect of human life - in the supermarket, in the workplace, at the cinema, in the street. It has no part of what should be an enjoyable pastime, a friendly rivalry, a coming together of like minded enthusiasts.

24 January, 2026

Cheap Jibes to Perpetuate the Great American Myth

 

I am very definitely not a supporter of jingoistic nationalism, the waving of the flag or my country right or wrong. I am suspicious of all things military and abhor violence of any kind or any mindless worship of battles and "heroes". An old friend said many years ago (she was about 80 at the time) when our TV screens and news broadcasts were filled with one of the many anniversary "celebrations" of the end World War 2: "Why are we still fighting this war 50 years after it ended". Betty was not wrong. When nations choose to go to war it means that reason, humanity and common decency have failed and we should all be ashamed.

However, Trump's latest outburst stating that soldiers from NATO were not in the front line during the campaigns in Afghanistan cannot and must not go unchallenged. I know nothing about the tactics of war or "the front line" that Trump refers to but having been around for 80 years I do know a cheap jibe when I hear it and I can usually spot a dodgy snake oil salesman, a dishonest charlatan, a bullying "wannabe" when I cross their path. As a teacher I've seen lots of them on the school playground - the school bullies, demanding an audience and craving misplaced "respect" from the rest of the children. Trump is just another immature playground bully, craving respect through fear and aggression rather than through any positive, worthwhile or even decent personal qualities and his offensive comments say more about him than they do about brave troops of any nation. Of course, he is, in many ways just regurgitating, spurting out (in Trump's case I think the word vomiting is more appropriate) the usual repetitive and tired Hollywood version of reality, a reality where history, events, people and actions are rewritten to fit the American narrative that America is the shining citadel on the hill and saves the world from itself, again and again and again. This bending of reality, or to use a more accurate term - lying - by Hollywood and wider America even extends to their own history, such as it is. The "cowboy films" of "the old West", or films and books like Gone With the Wind paint a picture of the good and virtuous white man, overcoming the evil native American or in the case of Gone With the Wind (and other such tales) being justifiably superior to black slaves. And no matter that the world has moved on, these myths are still perpetuated by Hollywood and firmly fixed in the mindset of white America - and especially so in the hearts and minds of Trump and his MAGA supporters. Both at home and globally America has, almost since its inception, manufactured, rehearsed and intentionally promoted and exaggerated its false image. Donald Trump is the latest and most objectionable promotor of this and his claim that only American soldiers were front line troops, saving the world and Afghanistan from themselves is just another dimension of the tired and disreputable old myth.  

If we are going to engage in cheap jibes in the Trump fashion how about this one? On 9/11 New York was hit by a dreadful terrorist attack and the world held its breath and rightly mourned for America. But I often wonder what America would have done if it had been faced with years of blitz of the kind we in the UK suffered in the last war, or that the Ukraine is suffering now or that the people of Gaza have suffered? To put it bluntly we would never have heard the end of it, the beating of American breasts and the uncontrolled weeping, wailing and wallowing would drown out all else. I wonder where Donald Trump would have hung out in such a scenario? Would he have been alongside John Wayne, Arnie Schwarzenegger, Tom Cruise and the rest of the faux American heroes, saving his Trump Tower from obliteration and rescuing the planet yet again - and then spending the rest of eternity retelling the great American myth, blowing the American trumpet? I suspect a more likely scenario is that he would be deep in his bunker, counting his gold, making a pact with the devil and making another deal to make money out of the dead and homeless - and having done his deals he would emerge into the wrecked world and boast that he had stopped another war. If you think that's a bit over the top then remember he proposed buying up ruined Gaza for "real estate", expelling the Palestinians and building a holiday theme park, the "Palestine Riviera"; the man is morally bankrupt and inhuman with absolutely no saving graces . No, there would be no front line for him or any of the other plastic "all American superheroes" - they'd be in their fox holes, cowering, all aggression and false bravery spent. In fact, just like the school bully standing in the Headmaster's Office blubbering, saying "It's not my fault, they told me to do it, I was only joking, please don't tell my mummy.....…"

I would humbly suggest (and going against all my pacifist principles!) that Trump "discusses" his view of NATO's front line involvement and the contribution of troops from the UK, France, Canada, Australia, the Netherlands, Spain, Poland, Italy etc. with people who know what they're talking about when it comes to Afghanistan, Iraq and other war torn areas. This discussion should be behind locked doors in the White House and involve Trump and a couple of war weary and battle hardened NATO squaddies who were in Afghanistan fighting, putting their lives on the line, sustaining terrible injuries and losing old comrades in what was, after all part of American President George Bush's "War on Terror" following 9/11. I'm sure that the two squaddies could and would, in true Don Corleone fashion, make Trump an offer he couldn't refuse. And, like the school bully when confronted with reality, he would squirm and bellow, sob and scream, have another tantrum but in the end be quite easily convinced when raw power explained it all to him and he would be keen to agree that he had "misspoke". He is essentially a coward, brave only when he is not challenged; he would beg forgiveness as the two squaddies towered over him and be anxious to apologise. And, hopefully, when he emerged from the Oval Office he would have the bruises to prove the depth of the "discussion" with the squaddies! Whether he would learn anything, however, is doubtful - he is beyond learning or redemption.

The man is an offensive and dangerous fool. Shame on America and Americans for giving him the power and the air to breath and vomit out his mindless and offensive ranting in 2016 and then again in 2024. And even more shame on them for not now removing him as unfit for public office. It says much about America and Americans - none of it good. All nations get the politicians and leaders they deserve and those leaders reflect the electorate and its culture. Over seventy years ago in his seminal work on 1950s America, "On The Road", an indictment of his country's rampant consumerism and the shallowness of the American dream, novelist Jack Kerouac, searching for meaning in life,  asked “Whither goest thou, America, in thy shiny car in the night?” His question was never answered and that same shallowness and rampant consumerism has brought us to where we  are today. Trump cannot be viewed in isolation, he is what America is and always has been; a nation that should be ashamed of what they are and what they have spawned.


09 January, 2026

"Resist the piping pedlar....... Choose to hold on tight to your humanity......."

Pamela Ireland's poignant, perceptive and pertinent poem “Choose” was written in 2018 at the height of the first Trump Presidency and the UK’s own deep social and political divisions over Brexit. It is powerful and prophetic commentary upon our times, even more relevant today, perhaps, than it was in 2018 as the world tumbles into a new dark age: Gaza, Ukraine, Putin, Netanyahu, Trump - evil and unstable mad men and each in charge of frightening power. In recent days the world has watched in various states of fascination and horror at the events in Venezuela: bombings, kidnapping, piracy on the high seas; a mad American President contemplating "buying" or invading and "stealing" another country (Greenland); an American President plumbing the depths of morality and demeaning that Great Office of State by justifying the common and shameless murder of a young woman on the streets of Minneapolis..... and today that same President advises us that “I don’t need international law” and that his power is only limited by his “own morality, my own mind.”  That explains a lot. His idea of right and wrong is wholly subjective. He is his own ethical and legal adviser, his own priest and confessor. He is a church of one. Trump lies to himself as well as everyone else. And the resulting damage is pernicious. It costs lives, harms democracy and destroys trust between nations. And yet, and tellingly, few across the world or in power raise their voices in protest. It is time, as Pamela's poem pleads, for the world to choose which path it takes:

Choose
What maggot eats
a human heart
that it would follow
willingly
a sly pied piper
peddling old lies
who wears the flag
like a cheap salesman’s smile?
What dark music
draws so many of us on
cheering and chanting
in an insane dance
towards a truthless land
where fear and hatred
are the people’s daily bread?
Already unseen hands
tap out orders
as behind the wire
faceless guards
take children
from their mothers.
Who perpetrates
such acts of separation
from their own humanity?
It could be any one of us
when the only choice
is guard or prisoner.
Choose.
Choose now
before the gates close.
Choose to defend
the hard won freedoms
that are every human’s right
before law dances to the piper’s tune
and fear trumps justice
and betrays the just.
Choose to resist
the piping pedlar
for he is the reaper
in disguise.
Choose to hold on tight
to your humanity
and wear it like a hazard suit
around your heart
for you will need it.
Those who would claim
to buy their freedom
with the suffering of innocents
sell everything
a human heart holds dear.

Pamela Ireland Duffy 29.06.2018

The greatest of the First World War poets, Wilfred Owen said that the role of all poets and writers is to speak the truth and Pamela Ireland’s poem does just that, it forces us to choose the world and the morals that we want and need. It puts to the test the unforgivable shame of swathes of the American electorate, American politicians, and our own UK Prime Minister and government, who will not choose to speak the truth, who sit on their hands, silent, afraid or unwilling to say what must and should be said and do what should be done. Their message to Donald Trump should be simple and unequivocal: "This shall not and will not be”; it must be said to state the importance of right over wrong, good over evil. As the great political commentator oft regarded as the father of the Conservative Party Edmund Burke reminded us in the 18th century
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing". If we and our elected representatives do not speak the truth then we become complicit in those deeds committed by those intent upon evil - in this case the malefic perpetrators in Washington who are supported by millions across America in the name of shallow pragmatism, failed economics, irresponsible might and untrammelled greed.

The world no longer pays heed to the wisdom found in Shakespeare's King Lear: in the final lines of this tragic tale of desolation and misrule Edgar warns that there are times when we must "Speak what we feel, not what we ought to say". In the terrible aftermath of the First World War which had wiped out a whole generation, as Russia descended into revolutionary and communist chaos, and as fascism rose in Europe William Butler Yeats told the truth and said what he felt in his poem “The Second Coming”. Yeats' words were prophetic for his time - and now ours, but this time the beast has risen in Washington’s White House not in Nazi Germany and it is spreading its tentacles across the world:
The Second Coming
Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.
Surely some revelation is at hand;
Surely the Second Coming is at hand.
The Second Coming! Hardly are those words out
When a vast image out of Spiritus Mundi
Troubles my sight: somewhere in sands of the desert
A shape with lion body and the head of a man,
A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun,
Is moving its slow thighs, while all about it
Reel shadows of the indignant desert birds.
The darkness drops again; but now I know
That twenty centuries of stony sleep
Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?
William Butler Yeats
These dark cold days of January, the start of the year, are a frightening metaphor for the dark age into which we are descending. Bright Spring might bloom in a few weeks as the seasons change, but mankind is tumbling into darker times, a cold winter it will be for us all which even gentle yellow daffodils, bright golden sun or the early morning blackbird's sweet song will be unable to brighten or cure. As Yeats foretold “….things are falling apart, anarchy is upon the world, and everywhere the ceremony of innocence is drowned”. The words in Pamela’s poem and Yeats’ warning from a century ago are profound and articulate wake up calls; it is time for us all to choose, to follow Edgar's advice and "say what we ought to say". The rough beast is upon and within us; its hour come on the streets of Minneapolis, on the streets of wider America - and it is slouching towards our own streets and to the corridors of power across the world; a sly presidential pied piper peddling again the old lies while wearing "the flag like a cheap salesman’s smile", the beast's Presidential "gaze blank and pitiless as the sun", demanding obedience and that knees be bent in servile homage as it snuffs out mankind's Spiritus Mundi. And America and we stand and stare, wring our hands, weep crocodile tears, confess our rage, betray our heritage, betray our fathers and grandfathers, and do nothing, and the beast leers and howls its victory cry.
Thank you Pamela for sharing not just your poem but your wisdom and foresight.