A week or so ago Guardian journalist George Monbiot posed
the question “What should we call the age in which we live”? Other ages have
had names given to them – the stone age, iron age, Elizabethan age, the
renaissance.......and so on. So what is our age? Monbiot elected for the age of
loneliness since we live in an
increasingly individualistic society where many live their lives through the
virtual world rather than with ”real” people. Of course, the digital age was
favoured by many correspondents to the Guardian as was the internet age, whilst
someone else suggested the obesity age! Having given this some thought my
choice would be "the excess age" for it seems to me that we live in a world characterised by excess.
When you've had every other thrill why not try this - if your life is so hollow and this is the best you can think of to brighten it |
I mention this by way of an introduction. It seems to me
that nowhere are the excesses of modern life more visible and maybe influential
than in the world of film, TV and books. We live in an age of mass
entertainment and instant access to the media be it Hollywood’s latest
blockbuster or a clip on YouTube – and wherever one looks the boundaries are being pushed. Many may argue
that this is a “good thing” – indeed it is difficult to argue against it, it is
the nature of art that boundaries are pushed. But in doing so it also
legitimises and makes what was once a “no no” seem acceptable. As the old song
goes “In olden days a glimpse of stocking
was looked on as something shocking now heaven knows anything goes” – so
very true. But what is also true is that too often
violence, sex, foul language, high end “excitement” and modern technology is a
substitute for a decent story line.
A few months ago Pat and I watched DVDs of the 1980’s BBC adaption of the John Le Carre “Smiley” spy stories – “Tinker Tailor, Soldier Spy” and “Smiley’s People” . The complex story lines were developed with high quality and sustained dialogue – just as in the books – with no use of foul language, excessive violence, clever technology or unnecessary sex to “spice them up” and make them more attractive. Modern viewers, I believe, would find them “boring”. Spies were portrayed as rather boring "ordinary people" - civil servants doing a complicated and complex job but still "everyday". I can’t conceive that if the BBC re-did the series that it would be the same today: every spy would tote a gun, every fight would be a blood bath, scenes would “zip” from one to another, the first five minutes of each programme would be spent doing a re-cap on the last episode (clearly, if one judges how modern serials on TV are introduced with excessive flash backs to the previous episode one can only assume that most of the population suffer from amnesia – or are simply not very bright!), every kiss would develop into a turgid sexploit, the urbane George Smiley would punctuate every sentence with expletives and every “baddy” would die spouting very visual blood, guts and gore. But Le Carre, as with any good writer, does not need this – the quality is in the story. The great tales of the world do not need it – their value is in the tale itself.
A few months ago Pat and I watched DVDs of the 1980’s BBC adaption of the John Le Carre “Smiley” spy stories – “Tinker Tailor, Soldier Spy” and “Smiley’s People” . The complex story lines were developed with high quality and sustained dialogue – just as in the books – with no use of foul language, excessive violence, clever technology or unnecessary sex to “spice them up” and make them more attractive. Modern viewers, I believe, would find them “boring”. Spies were portrayed as rather boring "ordinary people" - civil servants doing a complicated and complex job but still "everyday". I can’t conceive that if the BBC re-did the series that it would be the same today: every spy would tote a gun, every fight would be a blood bath, scenes would “zip” from one to another, the first five minutes of each programme would be spent doing a re-cap on the last episode (clearly, if one judges how modern serials on TV are introduced with excessive flash backs to the previous episode one can only assume that most of the population suffer from amnesia – or are simply not very bright!), every kiss would develop into a turgid sexploit, the urbane George Smiley would punctuate every sentence with expletives and every “baddy” would die spouting very visual blood, guts and gore. But Le Carre, as with any good writer, does not need this – the quality is in the story. The great tales of the world do not need it – their value is in the tale itself.
And so I come to the subject of this blog – the writings of John Harvey.
John Harvey - master of the police procedural novel but more importantly master observer of people and places |
John Harvey is a well established and award winning author of many years
standing who writes on a number of things – jazz, poetry but above all crime.
In particular he has written a series of books based in Nottingham, my home of
almost fifty years, about one particular fictional detective - Charlie Resnick. I came to John Harvey about seven or eight years
ago when an elderly friend loaned me a copy of one of his books. I was
recovering from a stay in the Queens Medical Centre cardiac unit having been
diagnosed with heart failure. From the moment that I received this book I was
hooked and since then have devoured all Harvey’s work. It has not only
been a succession of jolly good reads but has so often sustained me when I have
been “laid out” with my “dodgy ticker”!
I could praise many things
about Harvey’s work – the story lines, the utterly believable characters, the
attention to detail, the police procedural element – all of which are, in my
view, top class. But for me it is the absolutely accurate and sympathetic
picture of Nottingham, Nottinghamshire and their people that take the
prize. He does not write about
glamour and high end excitement but rather about real life and real
people and real places with all their
aspirations, problems, hopes, fears, oddities, passions and failures. His tales
are of people and places (mostly Nottingham) “warts and all.”
The last Resnick novel - and what a cracker |
No one – including, I
suspect, John Harvey – would describe his writing or his tales as “great
literature”. I’m sure that Harvey does not see himself as a modern day Charles
Dickens, Jane Austen or John Steinbeck. But like all those great authors he
shares their ability for the acute observation, for the feel of a person or
place and for making the ordinary and everyday sound important. Dickens, Austen
or Steinbeck did not write of the great earth shattering events they wrote of
ordinary people in caught up the situations of their time and Harvey does the
same. Dickens, Austen and Steinbeck (and others of their ilk) wrote of ordinary people of their circle and their society and in doing so not only left us great and memorable stories but stories and characters that reflected their age and in thus, a valuable perspective on that age and its people. Harvey, too, does that - anyone reading his Resnick novels in a hundred years time will know something of what it was like to live and work in a midland's town of the late twentieth and early twenty first centuries. To be fair - Harvey is not alone in this, another of my favourite authors is Graham Hurley who writes a similar series of crime fiction based in Portsmouth and the south west of England - all very ordinary and everyday - and accurate. Hurley is very good - he is not, however, John Harvey who is supreme.
For many modern day readers this might be “boring” – the ordinary and everyday to many is boring. In John Harvey’s work there is little or no high end excitement, excess, foul language is used only when appropriate, violence is part of the tales but it is included in an appropriate way – not simply to titillate. Harvey’s tales are equal to anything written by other popular crime writers of the day: Mark Billingham, Stewart MacBride or the hugely popular Ian Rankin. But whereas Rankin’s books (for example) are populated by violent and unpleasant characters – both police and criminal - Harvey’s are populated by ordinary people of the sort I might meet in the street or sit next to in the cinema. Whereas Rankin’s famous detective John Rebus is a hard drinking thug Harvey’s Charlie Resnick is “Mr Everyman”. Whereas authors like Rankin, MacBride or Billingham often populate their books with arch villains, detailed violence and complex plots Harvey’s villains, victims and characters are the ordinary man and woman caught up in particular situations – in short, they are in the context of the everyday. For example in the book I have just finished which concerns the finding of the remains of a body thirty years after a murder eventually turns out to be the result of an opportunist situation which had occurred in the miners’ strike of that time. There was a murderer, a villain, but it was almost a “there but for the grace of God go I” situation – we can all be heroes or indeed we can all be villains. And that is the essence (for me at least) of John Harvey – he tells of situations that might actually happen to anyone – the everyday incident that turns into a crime, the wayward youth who in the wrong set of circumstances spirals into a deadly situation or the colleague of Resnick who is killed not by some arch villain intent on police murder but by a drunken youth in a shop doorway - it is the everyday nature of life with all its misfortunes and opportunities for good or ill.
For many modern day readers this might be “boring” – the ordinary and everyday to many is boring. In John Harvey’s work there is little or no high end excitement, excess, foul language is used only when appropriate, violence is part of the tales but it is included in an appropriate way – not simply to titillate. Harvey’s tales are equal to anything written by other popular crime writers of the day: Mark Billingham, Stewart MacBride or the hugely popular Ian Rankin. But whereas Rankin’s books (for example) are populated by violent and unpleasant characters – both police and criminal - Harvey’s are populated by ordinary people of the sort I might meet in the street or sit next to in the cinema. Whereas Rankin’s famous detective John Rebus is a hard drinking thug Harvey’s Charlie Resnick is “Mr Everyman”. Whereas authors like Rankin, MacBride or Billingham often populate their books with arch villains, detailed violence and complex plots Harvey’s villains, victims and characters are the ordinary man and woman caught up in particular situations – in short, they are in the context of the everyday. For example in the book I have just finished which concerns the finding of the remains of a body thirty years after a murder eventually turns out to be the result of an opportunist situation which had occurred in the miners’ strike of that time. There was a murderer, a villain, but it was almost a “there but for the grace of God go I” situation – we can all be heroes or indeed we can all be villains. And that is the essence (for me at least) of John Harvey – he tells of situations that might actually happen to anyone – the everyday incident that turns into a crime, the wayward youth who in the wrong set of circumstances spirals into a deadly situation or the colleague of Resnick who is killed not by some arch villain intent on police murder but by a drunken youth in a shop doorway - it is the everyday nature of life with all its misfortunes and opportunities for good or ill.
One of the best civic squares in the midlands - now destroyed much to Resnick's (and my) disgust |
The new Market Square - a bland and barren wasteland. A blot on the city centre landscape. |
If you crave high end
excitement, a gun battle on every page, a bit of explicit sex plus dollops of
foul language and casual violence to litter your story then don’t read John
Harvey. But if you want a well crafted tale, populated with real people in real
places which will leave you in the end feeling satisfied with the outcome and, importantly, will have given you
a snapshot of life in a big English city and the way its people behave, then
you might just enjoy him.
Just a few of the Resnick takes |
You're so right - I'm just re-reading them all myself, before I allow myself to read the final story and say goodbye to Charlie. I'm on Cold in Hand now, and it hits me as hard as it did the first time round, because John Harvey makes you believe utterly in the characters, and care about them. Thanks for a lovely and fitting farewell tribute to John and Charlie!
ReplyDeleteWonderful tribute to the talented John Harvey and his creation. The books are just as you describe them: literate and wise in the ways of real people and the lives they lead. They move you and keep you interested. These things could possibly happen--and they often do. His are complex tales of the nature of man and of the heart, of loneliness and of taking risks, of crossing the fine line into bad behavior or of trying to do the right thing. A detective, and a writer, to be missed.
ReplyDelete