Showing posts with label Rupert Murdoch. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rupert Murdoch. Show all posts

13 May, 2012

A Saturday Afternoon Walk Through History

Last weekend Pat and visited our son and daughter in law who live near Reading – about one hundred and twenty miles away from where we live here in Nottingham. On Saturday afternoon we all went out together to visit Cliveden – the great house overlooking the Thames. It is one of the great buildings of England with a history that is closely interlinked with some of the great politicians, leaders, celebrities and events of the past two or three centuries.
Perhaps Cliveden’s most famous period was in the 1920s and 30s when the Astor family – the wealthy American millionaires - made it the social, intellectual and perhaps even political centre of Britain. In those days house guests included, amongst many others, various members of the Royal Family, Charlie Chaplin, Winston Churchill, Joseph Kennedy, George Bernard Shaw, Mahatma Gandhi, Amy Johnson, F.D. Roosevelt, H.H. Asquith, T.E. Lawrence (Lawrence of Arabia) and the writers Henry James, Rudyard Kipling. Nancy Astor, the wife of Waldorf, was the hostess at the glittering house parties that took place at Cliveden. She was also the first woman MP in the English Parliament.
Nancy Astor

Before the Astors took ownership of the property it had been one of the centres of political and social life in this country for two or more centuries. From the mid seventeenth century when it was owned by the Duke of Buckingham through the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries the house was closely linked with the great people and events of the nation. In 1740 when the house was owned by Frederick, the Prince of Wales, the great English patriotic aria “Rule, Britannia” was first performed there. On a more sombre note it is believed that it was at Cliveden in 1751 that the Prince received a blow to the chest from a cricket ball while playing in the grounds; the resulting infection proved fatal. The house is in a stunning position overlooking the Thames and the Thames Valley. As I looked down on the river from the grounds I thought how the river was a kind of symbol - flowing past Cliveden and then on to London and past Westminster - connecting this great house with the decisions that would be made in Parliament and by successive governments through the ages. What happened in Cliveden's drawing rooms (and bedrooms!) was carried down the river to Westminster  and perhaps shaped government policy!

But despite its glorious history Cliveden is still today perhaps most remembered for the rather less salubrious events that occurred there in the early 1960s – the Profumo affair – an event that rocked the country, was instrumental in a change of government and spawned films, books and perhaps a change in the way we view our political and social leaders.

The Beales bring a touch of class
to Cliveden. Would Nancy Astor
 have allowed us in? 
In 1942, the Astors had given Cliveden to the National Trust with the proviso that the family could continue to live in the house for as long as they wished. With the gift of Cliveden, the National Trust also received from the Astors one of their largest endowments (£250,000 in 1942 which is equivalent to about £8,637,518 today). The Astors ceased to live at Cliveden in 1968, shortly after the Profumo Affair.

In the early 1960s, John Profumo was the Secretary of State for War in Harold Macmillan's Conservative government. In 1961 he met Christine Keeler, a London call girl at a house party at Cliveden. The relationship with Keeler lasted only a few weeks before Profumo ended it. However, rumours about the affair became public in 1962, as did the allegation that Keeler was also having a relationship with a drug dealer, Johnny Edgecombe, and Yevgeny Ivanov, a senior naval attachĂ© at the Soviet embassy in London. Given Profumo's position in the government and with the Cold War at its height, the potential ramifications in terms of national security were grave, and this, along with the adulterous nature of Profumo's relationship with Keeler, quickly elevated the affair into a public scandal. As newspaper report followed newspaper report an increasingly complex and tangled web of intrigue and innuendo became the talk of the country – society osteopaths, call girls, government ministers, spies, drug dealers and attempted murder – and ordinary people began to look rather differently at those in power. Profumo was found to have lied about his role to Parliament and an official enquiry into the matter was undertaken. Within a few weeks of its report the Prime Minister, Harold Macmillan, resigned on the grounds of “ill health”. He was replaced by Sir Alec Douglas-Home but within the year the Conservatives were defeated and the country had a Labour government lead by Harold Wilson.
John Profumo

I can still remember as a teenager following the story of the Profumo scandal in the newspapers and reading of the alleged “goings on” at this great house near the Thames. I never dreamed that one day I would walk around its grounds with my grandchildren! Today the house is still in the hands of the National Trust, open to the public and is used as a great hotel.
The Christine Keeler photograph
that went round the world in 1963
Whatever “goings on” are part of its history, as you walk around its grounds, high over the Thames and look down on the river and out over the Thames Valley one can’t help feeling a sense of history when you consider the great names and great events that are its heritage . It is also stunningly impressive and imposing; Sir Harold Nicolson – the English diplomat, author, diarist and politician and the husband of writer Vita Sackville-West said in 1936 “There is a ghastly unreality about it all ... I enjoy seeing it. But to own it, to live here, would be like living on the stage of the Scala theatre in Milan”. Perhaps more kindly, in 1863, when the property was owned by allegedly the richest man in England – the Duke of Westminster – the Duke’s wife wrote: “When one lives in Paradise, how hard it must be to ascend in heart and mind to Heaven”. Having visited Cliveden on a number of occasions over the past few years I think both comments have equal worth!
Looking down on
the Thames - linking
Cliveden with Westminster!

I’ve thought about our visit a good deal in the past week as we have listened and watched further exposures at the Leveson Inquiry into the phone hacking affair involving Rupert Murdoch, the News of the World and powerful people in high places. In its way, it is not too different from the Profumo scandal of half a century ago. As we have heard of the relationships that allegedly developed between government ministers, Prime Ministers and powerful people like Rupert Murdoch one can imagine that in days gone by over the past centuries “deals were done”, influence was bought and sold, governments were influenced – all over a glass of sherry or a pleasant meal or on a stroll around the magnificent grounds at Cliveden. I suspect that had Murdoch and others of his ilk been around at the time of Nancy Astor’s glittering house parties he would have undoubtedly been a guest and broke bread with the Prime Minister of the day – tacit understandings, nods and winks and “gentlemen’s agreements” would have been the accepted norm! Perhaps the Murdoch exposures don’t indicate that political morality has “gone to the dogs” in modern Britain – perhaps (in fact probably) it has always been thus!
There is, however, a possible difference. In the days of Nancy Astor those invited to a Cliveden House party would have undoubtedly been those at the very top of the social tree – by their aristocratic birth (Prince Edward – later King Edward VIII?) or their great wealth (Joseph Kennedy?), their international prominence (Ghandi or Roosevelt ?) or their intellectual or literary accomplishments (Shaw or Kipling?). They were exclusive gatherings of the very great and good. It’s highly unlikely that the local school teacher or refuse collector or even vicar would have been invited! By the time of the Profumo scandal, however, the world had changed and Nancy Astor was long gone. Cliveden house parties were much more representative of a wider society – albeit the top end of the London social scene – osteopaths, diplomats, relatively minor politicians like Profumo – and call girls! Maybe this is where Murdoch might have better fitted in, together with his News International cronies – Rebekah Brooks and her kind! Probably understandings and agreements were still made over a glass of wine or a meal but perhaps more mundane or pragmatic nods and winks – a business deal, a job offer, an introduction to some powerful body, a liaison with an upper class call girl! Yes, that sounds more like Murdoch’s sort of house party – I don’t have to try very hard to imagine our present  Secretary of State for Culture, Jeremy Hunt, meeting someone from Murdoch’s empire in the grounds at Cliveden and, over a coffee or a whisky or glass of wine agreeing to nod through the BSky B deal so desired by Rupert Murdoch! All very grubby! I’d like to believe, however, (and I think that there is probably some substance to it) that in Nancy Astor’s day nothing so grubby as money or commerce would have been discussed – rather the great decisions of Empire and nations, stimulating intellectual discourse, literary and fashionable debate would have filled the lounges and been heard over the dining tables. As an addendum to this I might add (and this is pure, unashamed prejudice on my part!) the truly awful title and concept of a Secretary of State for Culture would, I think, have been an anathema to the guests at Nancy Astor's house parties!   Yes, I think perhaps things have changed!
The great and the good walked around
this fountain - and then there was us!

Today, of course, although Cliveden’s magnificent buildings and grounds are still there and beautifully kept by the National Trust and the hotel company that runs the exclusive hotel there are no more great house parties. It is only exclusive now in the sense that you can enter only if you pay the £8 per person entry at the gate or the several hundred pounds a night tariff to sleep and dine in the hotel. We all enjoyed a cup of tea and piece of cake in the tea room, we looked down on the Thames, we peered through the windows into the exclusive hotel and we spent a pleasant few minutes wandering around the wonderful maze – first built by Lord Astor in the late nineteenth century -and got stickers to prove we had reached its centre!

We got stickers when we got
 to the middle of the maze -  I
wonder if Nancy Astor gave a
sticker to Ghandi or Roosevelt
when they found the centre?
And as we did so it was easy to catch a moment of history – to imagine what stories the walls and the gardens and the maze and the dining tables and the bed pillows could tell if they could speak. Secrets whispered, agreements and trysts’ made, great decisions that would affect nations discussed, glittering wit and high politics mixed. It might seem all rather twee or old fashioned today in an age where money is king and increasingly used to define a person's worth and standing (rather than intellect, breeding or political or social prominence). But for me that was an extra joy of walking around Cliveden – not only was it a pleasant afternoon out but it was also a time when one could reflect on our history and the great events and people which have moulded us both as individuals as a nation - a real walk through history.

13 July, 2011

Musings on Musings - or, ramblings revisited!

The outpouring of news, comment, opinion and shocking revelation relating to News International , The News of the World, Rupert Murdoch and Rebekah Brooks and the rest has filled our air waves and newspapers for the past fortnight. In fact ever since I wrote my little play 'Eton Mess' and put it on the blog site, the phone, so to speak, has never stopped ringing! Perhaps I’m being 'hacked'! I can’t really believe that my little dramatic farce and my blog can really be totally responsible for the tumbling of the mighty Murdoch empire – but in the end, perhaps it was really, Inspector Morse behind the scenes quietly doing his job and exposing the wrong doings of the Oxford Set and all who mix with them! Whatever, from a few days after my blog appeared the exposures have been coming thick and fast! It has made me think where do we go next? Should I write another scent to my play and see if that illicits more exposure!

But the events of the last couple of weeks has also made me muse a little more on one or two of the other blogs that I have posed in recent weeks.

Some weeks ago – just after the royal wedding - I commented on the 'Mrs Malaprops of Fashion'. I commented on the dress code of the 'movers and shakers' of society, the royal family, celebrities and the like at the wedding and at social events like Royal Ascot. A couple of things have come along since then! Firstly, my daughter and family had a day out at the races – a work’s staff treat. Towards the end of the day I had a text from her. They had greatly enjoyed the event, won a few pounds with one or two bets and the grandchildren had enjoyed seeing the horses. A good day out. But, my daughter explained, she now knew that my blog had been correct when she had seen the fashion sense of the 'in crowd'. In fact, she put it far better than I – she knew now, she said, why the horses wear blinkers – 'it would be too frightening for the poor animals to see the made up trollops in the fashionable enclosures'!

And continuing this line of thought, I noticed, a week or two ago that Princess Beatrice, that priestess of high fashion and good breeding (she of the famous royal wedding 'hat') has been awarded her degree - a 2:i from Goldsmiths in London. The Princess has studied history and the history of ideas. Beatrice said: "I have had the most amazing university experience. Goldsmiths College is a wonderful place to study. I am so lucky to have had the support of the incredible tutors and staff. I am so excited about my results. I wish everyone graduating this year congratulations as well. It is amazing"

Well, no shortage of hyperbole there! As I read this erudite review of university life and success I was minded of Tony Judt’s famous comment: 'in the western tradition, how well you expressed a position corresponded closely to the credibility of your argument. Rhetorical styles might vary .... but it was never a matter of indifference: poor expression belied poor thought. Confused words suggested, at best, confused ideas........There is now a glib "popular" articulacy based upon shoddy prose and quality of argument and when words lose their integrity so do the ideas they express.' I may be wrong, but I would have hoped that someone who has studied the history of ideas - presumably this includes areas such as philosophy and the like - to degree level, would be able to go beyond 'popular articulacy' - especially if one is a princess of the realm!

I know I might be accused of being a grumpy old man, a curmudgeon, but I find it rather sad and worrying that in this day and age a young woman who is at the pinnacle of our ‘system’, has had the best private education that money can buy, is a member of a family that notionally, at least, govern us and whose every move and utterance is the subject of interest and debate in the media – both at home and in the wider world – cannot express herself rather more eloquently than this. Why was it ‘amazing’ and ’wonderful’. What characteristics did these ‘incredible’ tutors display? This is the expression and hyperbole of the of the street and the night club - facile, superficial and trivial. We should expect more.

Mind you, having said that I read this morning that Beatrice’s sister, Eugenie is in even more trouble! Newspapers today report that: ‘Party loving Princess Eugenie needs to take a leaf out of her sensible sister’s book after disappointing results in her English Literature, History of Art and Politics end-of-year exams at Newcastle University. “They were a fairly mixed bag,” said a friend. “Some grades were quite low and she’ll really have to cut the all-night partying if she wants to get a 2:1 like Beatrice.”

If the top royals lack a certain erudition and see partying as the way forward then I suppose there is small chance for us lesser mortals.

I thought of Beatrice and Eugenie when I watched a fly on the wall TV documentary last week about work in an A & E department. As well as the usual stories of critically injured people and the like there was a depressing piece showing four very silly and immature university students - four girls. As I watched I felt Beatrice and Eugenie would have fitted in well. I also thought of the blog that I wrote in June about a ' Coming to a street near you - a shrieking orgy of fake tan, false eye lashes, fights and booze'. The girls turned up at the department late at night having been to a fancy dress party – dressed as red Indians. Two of them had fallen off a bar on which they had been dancing (as you do!). They were clearly under the influence of drink, although not drunk. None were seriously injured. For the next few hours they proceeded to cause chaos in the department – dressing up in hospital items, complaining, being generally unhelpful, giggling, being rude to staff. How on earth the staff contained their composure was completely beyond me. But they did – through gritted teeth they did what they had to do and ensured that the girls were medically sound. That, of course, was right and proper – but for me I wanted to ask will a very large bill be sent to their parents? Will their university take action? I wondered if, when the girls saw the film, they would cringe with embarrassment? I suspect not, but not to do so belies, I believe, a weakness in our current system – not only of providing health care but of also how we bring up our children and what we expect of them.